Journey towards Gay Liberation

Note: Unfinished version

Journey towards Gay Liberation

The gay movement achieved a major milestone within the 1960s to 1980s; from raising its consciousness to challenging traditional values and energized opposition, this era was the establishment of LGBTQ’s position in society. The night of June 28^th 1969 marked the beginning of the gay revolution, as a fight broke out between authorities and gay men at a local New York City gay bar named Stonewall. Amidst the sea of angry patrons and their acts of rebellion, a change of consciousness arose in the public eye: we’re here, we’re queer, get used to it.  Ever since that night, the LGBT community has slowly emerged and developed into one of the most influential parts of our society in all political, social, legal and cultural aspects. The Stonewall incident was a bullet echoed beyond the New York City; it was the “spark that ignited the modern gay rights movement” (Miller 337) globally. For the first time, members of LGBTQ community resisted authority and voiced out their intolerance for inequality. Soon, Gay Liberation Front (GLF) as well as many other LGBTQ groups emerged and built the building blocks of gay liberation. These consciousness-raising groups were formed under shared oppression and marked the beginning of gay politics. However, the lack of attention for lesbians within GLF soon created a fracture within the gay movement; even within this subaltern group, there was another division: this time between gay and lesbians. The 1960s were primarily an important moment that defined the alien concept of LGBTQ integrating into society.

If the 1960s were about raising the awareness of this community, the 1970s were about be the rising role of mainstream gay politics. The successful election of Harvey Milk as the first widely known openly gay man in public office put gay politics into the national spotlight. It was an event to celebrate: the public had accepted the existence of this community and for the first time, they played a role in decision making for society. However, the gay movement faced multiple sources of backlash and strong opponents, one being Anita Bryant. Educated with traditional beliefs, Anita Bryant led a campaign to “repeal the ordinance” (372) and her organization, Save Our Children, Inc., gathered immense support and successfully repealed the gay rights law in Dade County. The Briggs Initiative, known also as Proposition 6, was another hindrance to gay political power. It proposed to ban all open homosexuals from teaching in California’s public schools. This was a significant episode because it was the first attempt “not merely roll back gay rights laws but to legally discriminate against homosexuals” (375). Fortunately, Proposition 6 did not pass. The 1970s played the role in increasing momentum towards gay liberation in politics and laws; even though it faced many obstacles, the gay movement was still capable of moving forward.

The 1980s, known as the AIDS decade, signifies the unity of the LGBTQ community and the refurbishment of the prior fractured coalition between gay men and lesbians. AIDS, a serious virus transmitted through sexual contact or transfusion of infected blood, became a political weapon used by opponents to further fuel arguments. Many publications took this opportunity and equated homosexuality with disease. Pat Buchanan, a conservative columnist, described AIDS as a way of “nature’s revenge” (Miller 421); Human Events, a right-wing weekly publication, reported “there has even been speculation that AIDS victims could deliberately contaminate the blood supply… a way to make certain that there is increased pressure on the federal government to find a cure” (Miller 421). The AIDS pandemic, along with the election of Ronald Reagan, threatened to halt all of political advances the gay movement made in previous decades. However, this disease did shed a new light to the LGBTQ community: it brought a new forefront of young gay men into the political movement, as well as the reconciliation between gays and lesbians. The LGBTQ community, hardened by adversity’s oppression, united together and strengthened as a political force, as well as pushed the community into militancy unknown before. The 1980s was a decade that brought gay visibility into the society and evoked a deeper sense of community, establishing a now more committed and unified community.

In his book Out of the Past, author Neil Miller elaborates on the consciousness and coalition of gay revolution since the 1960s; however, his misconception of the phrase “gay liberation” falsely represents the movement and should instead be replaced with the phrase “gay awakening”. “Gay liberation” indicates an absolute political and social acceptance of the LGBTQ community, with members protected by legislations and complete social tolerance. Miller, however, characterizes it not necessarily as freedom, but rather as the acceptance of a foreign concept and community. Since the age of Stonewall, society has recognized the emergence of the LGBTQ community and even though facing strong opposition, members of the community still strive to escape prejudice. Though Miller recognized the importance of momentum throughout these decades, his definition of the era is rather incorrect. He perceived liberation as simply the recognition of LGBTQ community, yet acceptance is merely the foundation of liberation. The term should be perceived as a whole, in which the gay community gains full social and economic opportunities as well as legal protection. In my opinion, “gay liberation” is the act of seeking not special but equal rights for the LGBTQ community; it is not bounded by discrimination from society but rather equipped with freedom of expression. Therefore the term awakening suits the emergence of this community better and on this solid foundation we can strive towards accomplishing social and political liberation for the LGBTQ community.

Liberation entails independence from all restrictions and rejections; this concept unfortunately still remains a distant hope and a source of constant struggle for the LGBTQ community. Even in the 21^st century, LGBTQ members still face prejudice despite the recognition of this subaltern group. Our perspective of the movement may have changed since the age of Stonewall, but we still perceive homosexuals as an abnormality in our society. As such, we have not achieved gay liberation yet and are most likely not to. Bias and prejudices are human nature, and it is in our dispositions to discriminate against those who do not fall under common standards. Nonetheless, regardless of liberation as an unattainable objective, it should remain a collective goal that unifies our society. Miller describes the gay liberation as “the potential for revolutionary change within each gay and lesbian person” (341). It is a reflection and awakening of each individual, especially members of the LGBTQ community, and through this revolution we are capable to understand and express our true selves. We are in the stages of working towards liberation. This ought to begin with proper education about the gay community, through popular media such as T.V. shows, and a breakdown of anti-gay prejudices in both culture and law. Even today, the LGBTQ community and allies are fighting against all odds to seek independence and liberty, to gain equal rights and complete tolerance. The election of President Obama has brought new hopes with his promise of putting forward gay rights protection. Liberation of the gay movement is currently a theory that hopefully one day will become reality.